Lamb, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.) kissbrides.com my explanation, Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). When the I am not sexy, are you currently sensuous or not?: Physical-appeal ratings and you can relationships choices because the a purpose of a person’s individual elegance. Emotional Research, 19, 669677. [ Links ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in marriage or any other personal relationship. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. Inside J. McV. Seem (Ed.), Character additionally the conclusion problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Press. [ Backlinks ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationships relationships destiny having insiders’ and you may outsiders’ angle: Which and you may what’s asked issues. Individual Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship high quality in the newly weds: A couple of centered method. Record away from Identity and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Legitimizing situations regarding the initiation off heterosexual relationship
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A beneficial. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Imagined resemblance and you may relationship profits one of matchmaking lovers: An enthusiastic idiographic approach. Diary out of Personal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880. [ Links ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Dating. Arizona, DC: Statement to your Pew Internet & American Existence Project. Recovered , out-of [ Website links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Evaluating the precision off predictions on dating relationship: Just how and just why perform lovers’ forecasts range from men and women made by observers? Identity and you will Public Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Links ]
The fresh interest-similarity hypothesis among cross-intercourse nearest and dearest: Dating satisfaction, imagined parallels, and self-offering perceptions
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Report shown at the Basic Around the globe Meeting to the Individual Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.A. (2000). Electronic relationships and you may virtual related: Conceptualizing computer mediated personal dating. Family, forty two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]
Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try actual similarity very important to interest? Good meta-data away from real and you will sensed resemblance. Log off Public and personal Relationship, twenty five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Morry, M. Yards. (2005). Dating fulfillment since a predictor away from similarity ratings; A test of your attraction-resemblance theory. Diary regarding Social and personal Relationship, 22, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you will extension of one’s SVR idea of dyadic pairing. Log out of ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: An effective 14-12 months longitudinal study of black partners and light partners. Journal from Personal and personal Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh like formula Fits thinks it has got discover a formula getting ruling the web matchmaking team: A scientific way to find Mr. or Ms. Proper. Providers 2.0 Mag. Retrieved on out-of [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Character similarities inside people. Identification and you will Personal Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Companion needs: What characteristics manage men and women desire within their brief-term sexual and you can a lot of time-identity romantic lovers? Log away from Mindset and you may Individual Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new character of your care about on the initiation and you may span of societal correspondence. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]